In an interesting twist that I haven’t seen mentioned anywhere else, the free Skype App for the iPhone is now available to Canadian users of the iPhone and iPod Touch. For reasons that nobody could adequately explain to me, the app was initially only available for US based users. I was therefore very surprised when I came across it in the app store on iTunes yesterday. I wonder if this has anything to do with the recent purchase of Skype by a conglomerate that includes the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board??

Skype is a very cool app that allows iPhone and iPod users to make voice calls over the internet, using either the 3G network (iPhone only) or a WiFi connection. Calls are free to other Skype users and inexpensive to landlines and mobile phones. The Skype service also includes additional features such as instant messaging, file transfer and video conferencing; however, only some of these features are currently available with the app.

This is very exciting because the iPod Touch can now be used as a phone (if you have an add-on microphone) anywhere that a wireless internet connection is available. For many users that will be all day long in their home and office locations, or even at McDonalds and Starbucks locations that off WiFi service to their customers.

How long will it be before WiFi is available everywhere? That would eliminate the need to carry a mobile phone and/or to pay for an expensive data plan.

I love my iPod Touch and I use it all the time. Before I actually got one I had been coveting it for a long time.

Without doing all that much research on it I naturally assumed that it would consist of the exact same hardware as the iPhone, and would be missing only the ability to make and receive phone calls. I was quite surprised to discover that the hardware was actually quite different; the Touch was smaller and lighter, and, most significantly, did not have a built-in camera.

Fast forward about 18 months to the launch of the iPhone 3Gs which included not only an improved still camera, but also video camera functionality. It also received a wide variety of software upgrades in the form of the iPhone OS 3.0. At that time there was no corresponding launch of new hardware for the iPod Touch, but the existing device got a de-facto upgrade since it was compatible with the OS 3.0 upgrade. Everyone naturally assumed that Apple was simply stalling in order to ensure high demand for the upgraded phone, and that new hardware for the Touch would follow a few weeks of months later.

This finally happened this week when Apple released a whole new lineup of iPods.  This release also came with a major update to iTunes 9.0 and also to the iPhone OS 3.1.  Some of the highlights of the release include:

• new colors and lower prices for the iPod Shuffle
• a massive 160 GB hard drive in the iPod Classic
• a faster processer in the iPod Touch (the same as in the iPhone 3Gs) and a new 64 GB model
• a video camera (with microphone and built-in speaker) and FM tuner in the iPod Nano

What?  The Nano gets a video camera, but the Touch doesn’t? 

Video is king right now and I can see why apple would want to shove a camera into all of their iPods.  But never in a million years did I expect to see it in the Nano before it was in the Touch.  The iPhone already has it so it seemed like a lock that the Touch would get it next.  My 32GB 2nd gen iPod Touch is plenty fast enough and without a camera in the new generation I’m really not sure why any existing iPod Touch owner would upgrade to the new model.  Even new iPod buyers should be able to pick up some great deals on the 2nd Generation devices.  For me this announcement is just plain odd.

Oh well, maybe bext time.

I recently gave the i-GotU GPS Dataloggers what I would call a pretty scathing review.

I’ll let you read the entire review yourself for all the pros (there are a couple) and cons (there are lots) about the device, but the short story is that while the device works reasonably well, in my opinion the software that it ships with and the device itself are flaky and need massive useability improvements. Note that my review specifically covered the GT-200 unit, but the GT-120 has essentially the same feature set and therefore the same pros and cons.

I would not recommend this device for any serious photographer looking to geotag images with the GPS coordinates at which the image was created. There may be people for whom this gadget would be great (for an interesting (and far less negative) review please see the recent article over at imaging-resource.com), but I am simply not one of them.

Now to the update… I recently took this device with my on a week long trip from Calgary, Alberta, through Glacier National Park in Montana, down to Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, back up to Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park in southern Alberta, and then back home to Calgary. For almost the entire week the device tracked my route and location perfectly. I charged it every couple of days and I have great data from Glacier and Writing-on-Stone, and for most of the 4 days in Yellowstone. But. Not. All. Of. Yellowstone.

Mysteriously, the unit simply stopped recording for an entire day in the middle of the trip. It didn’t shut off. The battery wan’t dead. It continued to blink at regular intervals to show that it was alive and well. It even blinked appropriately when I hit its button (yes, it has only one) to mark specific waypoints. But it didn’t record any of it.

I made over a thousand images that day as we travelled extensively through the park, including several hours of walking at Upper Geyser Basin (home of Old Faithful). I’m not amused.

I was already considering getting rid of my GT-200, but this trip was the final straw that clinched it. Anybody want to buy it?? Who can suggest a better one for me??