Photographers love to go on and on about what gear they use, and why they made that choice. One topic that I hear covered ad nauseum is the size of their flash memory cards. Bigger is better, right? Not necessarily, it seems. Many photographers love to argue that using 1 really large flash card is just like putting all your eggs in one basket. That is, if a CF or SD card goes bad, you could potentially lose a lot more of your images than if you had used multiple smaller cards instead.

While that logic seems perfectly reasonable, I take another line of thought on this one.

I’ve made many thousands of images over the years, and I’ve never had a card go bad. Don’t get me wrong, I know that these things are a lot like hard disk drives and that statistically they WILL eventually fail. But that hasn’t happened to me yet. So while I am careful with my cards, and I am definitely concerned about one of them going bad and corrupting my files, I don’t think that it’s the most likely way that I will lose my images.

I have physically lost many pieces of photography gear over the years, including a couple of very expensive CompactFlash cards. So for me, the far more likely way that I would lose images would be to lose or misplace a full card after I changed it out for an empty one.

For me, this choice is easy. I use the biggest and fastest memory cards I can afford. Currently that means Lexar 8 GB 300x CompactFlash
cards, but I plan to upgrade to 16 GB cards soon. I also have some older SanDisk Ultra II cards and I’ve never had an issue with any of them or with any of my Lexar cards.

Am I putting all my eggs in one basket? Maybe, but for me that makes more sense than having a bunch of smaller cards that are difficult to manage and keep track of.

What about you? One big card, or several smaller cards?

Related Posts

1. Discount Codes for MOO Cards
2. Accessories for the Canon 1D Mark IV
3. Photo Quick Tip: Delete Your Bad Pictures
4. Early Review of the Canon 1D Mark IV
5. My Photography Workflow